|
All,
Does anyone know why the instructions from the Samba4 Howto recommend installing gtkhtml for RH/CentOS6? The command-line shown doesn't work: No package gtkhtml available. No package libsemange-python available. But I'm wondering if it matters. I do see a gtkhtml2 and gtkhtml3 available. Thanks, Brian |
|
Hi Brian,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:34:11AM -0400, Brian C. Huffman wrote: > Does anyone know why the instructions from the Samba4 Howto > recommend installing gtkhtml for RH/CentOS6? > > The command-line shown doesn't work: > No package gtkhtml available. > No package libsemange-python available. > > But I'm wondering if it matters. I do see a gtkhtml2 and gtkhtml3 > available. I think that's a mistake; there isn't anything that uses gtk in Samba4 itself. Cheers, Jelmer |
|
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Brian, > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:34:11AM -0400, Brian C. Huffman wrote: > > Does anyone know why the instructions from the Samba4 Howto > > recommend installing gtkhtml for RH/CentOS6? > > > > The command-line shown doesn't work: > > No package gtkhtml available. > > No package libsemange-python available. > > > > But I'm wondering if it matters. I do see a gtkhtml2 and gtkhtml3 > > available. > I think that's a mistake; there isn't anything that uses gtk in Samba4 > itself. > I updated the wiki just now... removed the gtkhtml entry and corrected the libsemanage-python typo in that section. - B. > Cheers, > > Jelmer > |
|
Bob,
Great! Have you done any more work with selinux that isn't in the wiki? It appears that it definitely will *not* work without some changes if you're using the DLZ functionality. Thanks, Brian On 05/15/2012 03:31 PM, Bob Cavey wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:34:11AM -0400, Brian C. Huffman wrote: > > Does anyone know why the instructions from the Samba4 Howto > > recommend installing gtkhtml for RH/CentOS6? > > > > The command-line shown doesn't work: > > No package gtkhtml available. > > No package libsemange-python available. > > > > But I'm wondering if it matters. I do see a gtkhtml2 and gtkhtml3 > > available. > I think that's a mistake; there isn't anything that uses gtk in Samba4 > itself. > > > I updated the wiki just now... removed the gtkhtml entry and > corrected the libsemanage-python typo in that section. > > - B. > > > > Cheers, > > Jelmer > > |
|
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Brian C. Huffman <
[hidden email]> wrote: > Bob, > > Great! > > Have you done any more work with selinux that isn't in the wiki? It > appears that it definitely will *not* work without some changes if you're > using the DLZ functionality. > > Unfortunately not, too many other projects distracting me. I'm planning on upgrading in early June so I'll post updates as I go. - B > Thanks, > Brian > > > On 05/15/2012 03:31 PM, Bob Cavey wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <[hidden email]>wrote: > >> Hi Brian, >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:34:11AM -0400, Brian C. Huffman wrote: >> > Does anyone know why the instructions from the Samba4 Howto >> > recommend installing gtkhtml for RH/CentOS6? >> > >> > The command-line shown doesn't work: >> > No package gtkhtml available. >> > No package libsemange-python available. >> > >> > But I'm wondering if it matters. I do see a gtkhtml2 and gtkhtml3 >> > available. >> I think that's a mistake; there isn't anything that uses gtk in Samba4 >> itself. >> > > I updated the wiki just now... removed the gtkhtml entry and > corrected the libsemanage-python typo in that section. > > - B. > > > >> Cheers, >> >> Jelmer >> > > |
|
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Brian C. Huffman <
> [hidden email]> wrote: > >> Bob, >> >> Great! >> >> Have you done any more work with selinux that isn't in the wiki? It >> appears that it definitely will *not* work without some changes if you're >> using the DLZ functionality. >> >> > > on upgrading in early June so I'll post updates as I go. > > Brian, I just upgraded from alpha-14 to beta1 in my test setup in VM-land before I upgrade the real server. I used the FC16 bind-9.8.3.-1.src.rpm took out the systemd-units dependency, re-built RPMS in RHEL 6.2 and installed follow-up with beta1 compile and install, things seem to be OK but I only have one Win7 machine to test login, GPO management, AD Users and Computers snap-ins. NOTE: I am still running with DNS flatfiles and a single DC. After install beta1, I made sure DNS was happy via samba_dnsupdate --verbose, then fired off samba-tool dbcheck which reported 200+ missing GUID errors in which I ran --fix to resolve. Sometime after a reboot or restart?? I had to add SELinux label for the .jnl file ( updated on the wiki with some other fixes I made recently ). I then saw a reply to a post from Andrew about running dbcheck --cross-ncs which on my install threw a couple thousand errors about missing GUID, and followed-up on that same thread Andrew attached a patch --> 0001-s4-dbcheck-Always-specify-the-dhcheck-control.patch for the dbchecker.py script and ran that. Looks like I'm ready when I get the green light to patch the servers I can repeat again. - Bob |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
