Quantcast

SAMBA 2.0.7 on Solaris 9 - How to disable port 445

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

SAMBA 2.0.7 on Solaris 9 - How to disable port 445

joe.ward
I have SAMBA 2.0.7 running on about 20 Solaris 9 servers around the US.
One location is experiencing interruptions for Windows XP clients who map
to the SAMBA server.  There are no known changes to Solaris or SAMBA to
explain the change.

The problem is very random.  I have seen postings that discuss how XP uses
ports 139 and 445.  Is there a way to block port 445 in SAMBA 2.0.7?  The
"smb ports" configuration file entry is invalid for 2.0.7.  I tried "smb
-p 139  - D" and there is still traffic on port 445.

Is there a way to block all TCP port 445 activity on the server side
without having to learn SunScreen?

Any suggestions will be most appreciated.
Joe Ward
[hidden email]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: SAMBA 2.0.7 on Solaris 9 - How to disable port 445

Michal Kurowski
[hidden email] [[hidden email]] wrote:
>
> Is there a way to block all TCP port 445 activity on the server side
> without having to learn SunScreen?

Two options:

1) upgrade to samba 3 (I know, might not be feasible but eventually
   you will have to that ;-)

2) make use of some other firewalls (should be there, somewhere ?)

HTH

--
Michal Kurowski
<[hidden email]>


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: SAMBA 2.0.7 on Solaris 9 - How to disable port 445

John H Terpstra - Samba Team
In reply to this post by joe.ward
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 20:56, [hidden email] wrote:
> I have SAMBA 2.0.7 running on about 20 Solaris 9 servers around the US.
> One location is experiencing interruptions for Windows XP clients who map
> to the SAMBA server.  There are no known changes to Solaris or SAMBA to
> explain the change.
>
> The problem is very random.  I have seen postings that discuss how XP uses
> ports 139 and 445.  Is there a way to block port 445 in SAMBA 2.0.7?  The
> "smb ports" configuration file entry is invalid for 2.0.7.  I tried "smb
> -p 139  - D" and there is still traffic on port 445.

No need to. Samba-2.x does not support port 445 afaicr.

>
> Is there a way to block all TCP port 445 activity on the server side
> without having to learn SunScreen?

Not needed if it is inactive.

>
> Any suggestions will be most appreciated.

Best suggestion is to update to Samba-3.0.14a. Please let me know if you need
help. You can contact me on (801) 936-1368.

- John T.
--
John H Terpstra
Samba-Team Member
Phone: +1 (650) 580-8668

Author:
The Official Samba-3 HOWTO & Reference Guide, ISBN: 0131453556
Samba-3 by Example, ISBN: 0131472216
Hardening Linux, ISBN: 0072254971
Other books in production.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Loading...