[Bug 11513] New: Modified rrsync to support write-only usage

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 11513] New: Modified rrsync to support write-only usage

samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11513

            Bug ID: 11513
           Summary: Modified rrsync to support write-only usage
           Product: rsync
           Version: 3.1.2
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P5
         Component: core
          Assignee: [hidden email]
          Reporter: [hidden email]
        QA Contact: [hidden email]

Created attachment 11428
  --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11428&action=edit
Proposed patch to add -wo option to rrsync that is mutex with existing -ro
option

I needed to use rrsync as a write-only solution rather than a read-write or a
read-only solution.  I added an additional option -wo that does this.  It also
traps the error condition that a person specifies BOTH the -ro and the new -wo
options.

I'm attaching the patch in case you wanted to include it going forward.

Thank you very much.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 11513] Modified rrsync to support write-only usage

samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11513

Wayne Davison <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison <[hidden email]> ---
Seems like a simple and reasonable thing to add.  I appreciate the patch,
though I made the change a little differently (e.g. your code wouldn't have
complained about -wo -ro, though it would have complained about -ro -wo).

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html